Validations and clinical studies All Microlife blood pressure monitors have passed BHS & ESH validation protocols

Header_Validation_AFIB

Validations and clinical studies

Triage tests for identifying atrial fibrillation in primary care: a diagnostic accuracy study comparing single-lead ECG and modified BP monitors, Kearley, 2014

2014, Karen Kearley, Mary Selwood, Ann Van den Bruel, Matthew Thompson, David Mant, FD Richard Hobbs, David Fitzmaurice, Carl Heneghan

Header_WatchBP Validation-Diabetes

Diabetes

Validation of the Microlife BP A3 PC upper arm blood pressure monitor in patients with diabetes mellitus according to the ANSI/AAMI/ISO 81060-2:2013 protocol, Beime, 2017

Dec 18., 2019

Beate Beime^a, Ralf Krüger^a, Gertrud Hammel^b, Peter Bramlage^aand Cornelia Deutsch^a

Headerpictures WatchBP Validation

Accuracy validation of the Microlife 3AS1-2 blood pressure device in a pregnant population with low blood pressure, Nathan, 2015

Headerpictures WatchBP Validation

An accurate semiautomated oscillometric blood pressure device for use in pregnancy (including pre-eclampsia) in a low-income and middle-income country population: the Microlife 3AS1-2, Nathan, 2014

Headerpictures WatchBP Validations AFIB

Screening for atrial fibrillation with automated blood pressure measurement: Research evidence and practice recommendations, Verberk, 2016

Header Microlife & WatchBP Clinical Studies

Evaluation of interarm blood pressure differences using the Microlife WatchBP Office in a clinical setting, Krogager, 2017

Microlife_PAD_WristDevice_Header

Validation of the Microlife BP A200 Comfort and W2 Slim automated blood pressure monitors in a general adult population according to the European Society of Hypertension and the ANSI/AAMI/ISO 81060-2:2013 protocols, Bing, 2015

Header Microlife & WatchBP Clinical Studies

Measurement accuracy of a stand-alone oscillometric central blood pressure monitor: a validation report for Microlife WatchBP Office Central. Am J Hypertens, Cheng, 2013